1.7 C
New York
Tuesday, January 19, 2021
Advertisement

Shinola Detroit Canfield In-Ear Monitors (TheaterByte Gear Review)

The Performance
Design/Ergonomics
Value

Shinola Detroit Canfield In-Ear Monitors

Shinola Detroit is a present-day success story that began as a designer watch, leather and bicycle manufacturer. More recently, this company has entered the highly competitive arena of audio with speakers, turntables, headphones, and the subject of this review, you guessed it, the high-end Shinola Detroit Canfield in-ear monitors! For those with long memories, the term “Shinola” became synonymous with poop. Before going any further, I can assure you that, regarding this product, such a pejorative designation is absolutely the farthest from the truth.

Over the past few years, my aging ears have been treated to a wide range of earphones, now rebranded as “in-ear monitors” to indicate significantly improved audio performance. The price of admission to the world of in-ear monitors varies widely from about a hundred dollars to an eye- and ear-popping several thousand dollars. For example, my reference Astell & Kern AK T8iE MK II earphones tip the beams at $999.

Set Up

Earphones are literal plug-n-play devices that, once out of the box, need only to be mini-plugged into your portable music player and off you go. There are various approaches to get the sounds from your digital device into your eardrums. Most earphones like my AK T8iE MK II use dynamic drivers while some choose balanced armature designs (the same one used in high performance hearing aids). The rap against balanced armature earphones is their limited bass response that is important consideration when you consider how small these transducers are when compared to standard headphones.

The Shinola Detroit Canfield IEMs have wisely gone the dynamic driver route and each channel has an 8.5 mm beryllium driver designed, assembled, and tested in partnership with Campfire Audio in Detroit. The packaging belies the $195 retail price with its sturdy outer box and a nice zippered carrying case that will protect these IEMs when not in use. There is one pair of comfortable memory foam earpieces and three silicone ear tips that differ in size and should fit nearly every pair of ears. Another  thoughtful touch is the tangle-resistant connecting cable. Nominal impedance is a device-friendly 16.5 Ω @ 1kHz and the 3.5 mm mini-plug is intended for unbalanced inputs. The stated frequency response is 10 – 20kHz at less than 1% THD. For those planning on using the Canfields with their cell phones, there is a microphone and volume control. The Canfields are available in black or silver-colored stainless steel.

Miniplug, volume control and microphone
Miniplug, volume control and microphone

 

Can the Canfields Meet the Earphone Challenge?

Befitting the evaluation of deluxe earphones, I matched the Shinola Detroit Canfield IEMs with an Astell & Kern AK240 digital player and, much later, moving in the opposite direction with the large music library on my new iPhone 7. A varied playlist was fed to the Canfield earphones from the AK240 that included the following:

  • The Eagles: “Hotel California” (44.1kHz/16-bit FLAC file)
  • Esperanza Spalding/Gretchen Parlato: “Inutil Paisajem” (96kHz/24-bit FLAC file)
  • Radkha Toneff/Steve Dobrogosz: “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress” (44.1kHz/24-bit FLAC file)
  • Ella Fitzgerald/Louis Armstrong: “Why Can’t We be Friends” (96kHz/24-bit FLAC file)
  • Jeremy Monteiro: “A Song for You” (DSD64 file)
  • Isaac Freeman: “Beautiful Stars” (44.1kHz/24-bit FLAC files)
  • Michael Jackson: “Thriller” (DSD64 file)
  • Original Flying Pickets: “When You’re Young and in Love (44.1kHz/16-bit FLAC file)
  • Diana Krall: “Peel Me a Grape” (96kHz/24-bit FLAC file)
  • Paul Simon: “Diamonds on the Soles of Her Shoes” (96kHz/24-bit FLAC file)
  • Sonny Boy Williamson: “Keep it to Ourselves” (176.4kHz/24-bit WAV file)
  • Ry Cooder: “Little Sister” (44.1kHz/16-bit FLAC file)
  • Train: “Hey Soul Sister (44.1kHz/16-bit FLAC file)
  • Holly Cole: “So and So” (44.1kHz/16-bit FLAC file)

Switching to the iPhone 7, the playlist of mp3 resolution files included the following:

  • The Spice Girls: “Saturday Night” (320kbps)
  • Boyzone: “No Matter What” (128kbps)
  • Celia Cruz: “Yo Vivere” (128 kbps)
  • Dire Straits: “Sultans of Swing” (128kbps)
  • Esperanza Spalding/Gretchen Parlato: “Inutil Paisajem” (128kbps)
  • Gypsy Kings: “Hotel California” (128kbps)
  • Rick Astley: “It Would Take a Strong Man” (128kbps)

Beginning with the higher-resolution files on the AK240, I got an excellent presentation of breadth (depth is not the long suit of earphones). Mids and highs were crystal clear, and bass when present in tracks like “Thriller” was acceptable if not at the subterranean level of some top-of-the-line headphones. There was a consistency in the really great sounding tracks like “Peel Me a Grape” or “Diamonds on the Soles of Her Shoes” that opened up the background details that lesser earphones simply gloss over.

A real revelation occurred when I switched to the iPhone’s mp3 files. We all know that listening through the crappy plastic earbuds that come along for the ride does no favors for these downloads. When I plugged in the Canfields, it was a truly different story. You would never be deceived into believing that these were hi-res selections but there were hidden goodies in “Saturday Night” (the swirling background sounds) or the detailed harmonies of “No Matter What” that greatly enhanced the overall listening experience.

I know that you have waited during this entire review for the final showdown between the Canfields and my reference earphones, the Astell & Kern AKT8iE. At five times the price and capable of balanced operation, the AK in-ear monitors were definitely more open, smoother, and provided fuller bass. That said, the Shinola Canfield in-ear monitors were never embarrassed and, at their price point, became serious overachievers. During listening sessions that often went on for more than two hours, these IEMs provided a good fit and were extremely comfortable to boot. It was also a bonus to have cables that resisted the tangling that has been the bane of many of my previous earphones.

The Final Assessment

For those ready to chuck their cheap earbuds and make a serious upgrade, the Shinola Detroit Canfield in-ear monitors will definitely fill that bill and make your ears smile.

Specifications:

  • Frequency Response
    • 10 Hz-20 kHz
  • Impedance
    • 16.5 Ohms nominal, 1kHz
  • Sensitivity
    • 104 dB SPL
  • THD
    • Less that 1% THD

4.2 / 5 Reviewer
{{ reviewsOverall }} / 5 Users (0 votes)
Shinola DetroitBrand
www.shinola.comWebsite
$195.00MSRP
Pros
  • Excellent build quality
  • Comfortable for long listening sessions
  • Tangle-resistant cables
  • Great value
  • Cons
  • Bass a bit limited
  • Summary
    A reasonably priced set of earphones that delivers excellent performance and comfort for long listening sessions.
    The Performance
    Design/Ergonomics
    Value
    What people say... Login to rate
    Order by:

    Be the first to leave a review.

    User Avatar User Avatar
    Verified
    {{{ review.rating_title }}}
    {{{review.rating_comment | nl2br}}}

    This review has no replies yet.

    Avatar
    Show more
    Show more
    {{ pageNumber+1 }}

    Advertisement

    Related Articles

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Stay Connected

    301FansLike
    0FollowersFollow
    723FollowersFollow
    - Advertisement -

    Notice of Compliance with FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 255

    In accordance with the Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR part 255 guidelines, this website hereby states that it receives free discs and other theatrical or home entertainment “screeners” and access to screening links from studios and/or PR firms, and is provided with consumer electronics devices on loan from hardware manufacturers and/or PR firms respectively for the purposes of evaluating the products and its content for editorial reviews. We receive no compensation from these companies for our opinions or for the writing of reviews or editorials.
    Permission is sometimes granted to companies to quote our work and editorial reviews free of charge. Our website may contain affiliate marketing links, which means we may get paid commission on sales of those products or the services we write about. Our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers or affiliate partnerships. This disclosure is provided in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR § 255.5: Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.

    Latest Articles

    %d bloggers like this: