3.2 C
New York
Thursday, December 1, 2022

12 Angry Men (1957) (Classic Film Review)

12 Angry Men (1957)12 Angry Men is a film that has to do with twelve people who are to decide the fate of an 18-year-old kid accused of his father’s murder.


Twelve jurors, people from different social classes and different kinds of professions, are about to decide whether an 18-year-old is the murderer of his father or not. If he is found guilty, the punishment will be the death penalty. It appears to be an easy case, with everyone except for Juror 8, being completely sure that the guy killed his father because of the violent outbursts of his father. In general, there appears to be a lot of prejudice against him, because of the defendant’s incidents of juvenile delinquency in the past, his detention during his younger years and the slum where he lived. However, Juror 8 shows his doubt of whether the defendant was actually the murderer and invites the rest of them to engage in a deep conversation thoroughly investigating the clues in the hope of changing their minds.

I really enjoyed the plot structure of the film and the way the hidden clues are combined with the characteristics of each juror’s life. In fact, it highlights the importance of pluralism, because every juror understands things through personal experiences, special characteristics, and age. Also, it shows how significant it is that jurors take their duty seriously, and not make quick decisions, judging only by the surface. What I also found interesting, is that the movie put some emphasis on the lawyer of the defendant, who maybe was not motivated or skilled enough to provide the court with sufficient arguments, which is also another issue. The use of dialogue was very sophisticated and it made the movie even more intriguing.

Henry Fonda and Joseph Sweeney in 12 Angry Men (1957)
Henry Fonda and Joseph Sweeney in 12 Angry Men (1957)


Although it is very hard to choose for the best performances, as the cast did a very good job, if I were to decide for my top 5 I would opt for:

  • Henry Fonda’s performance as juror eight, who expresses his doubts concerning the case and opposes the rest of the eleven jurors, trying to convince them to rethink their opinions and give another thorough look to the clues.
  • Lee J.Cobb’s whose role in this is that of the most aggressive juror 3, and the most difficult to be convinced by any evidence or swayed toward any reasonable doubt. He appears dogmatic and unwilling to take another opinion into consideration rather than his own prejudice. At the scene of the climax before the end scene he was amazing.
  • Jack Warden’s, playing the role of a salesman (juror 7), who doesn’t take the responsibility to holding another person’s life in his hands seriously. He only cares about attending the baseball game after the trial.
  • George Voskovec, whose acting was very passionate and full of emotions as juror 11 and
  • John Fiedler, who was great at playing a first time attending and enthusiastic kind of nerdy juror 2.

Generally, the characters/ jurors are distinguished from each other mainly because of some particular details, like for example Juror 4 (played by E.G.Marshall) wearing glasses, Juror 5 (by Jack Klugman) having grown up in a slum, Juror 12 (by Robert Webber) for working in marketing/ management and Jurors 9 and 10 (Joseph Sweeney and Ed Begley respectively) for being elderly.


Director Sidney Lumet was really good at establishing the details that made the film’s atmosphere unnerving, like the excessive heat and the rain. The fact that it takes place within the walls of a room small room makes it feel claustrophobic and more intense. There is a scene of the interior of the court at the beginning and in the end, we see parts of its corridors and the building’s exterior, with the cinematography generally being restricted to the room where the discussions among the jurors take place.


I was not fully satisfied with the ending, as I wanted to see the announcement of the verdict as a scene, still it does not affect the opinion I have for this film. For me, the ending is a mixture of back to square one in terms of cinematography with a tone of resolution and humor.

12 Angry Men was originally released in theaters on 10 April 1957 (USA)

  • The Film: 5/5
  • Plot: 5/5
  • Character — Lead: 5/5
  • Character — Supporting: 4.5/5
  • Directing: 4.5/5
  • Cinematography: 4.0/5
  • Studios & Distributors: Orion-Nova Productions | MGM Studios
  • Country: USA
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 96 mins.
  • Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
  • Director: Sidney Lumet
  • Writers: Reginald Rose (story) | Reginald Rose (screenplay)
  • Original Release Date: 10 April 1957 (USA)

Related Articles

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay Connected

- Advertisement -

Notice of Compliance with FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 255

In accordance with the Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR part 255 guidelines, this website hereby states that it receives free discs and other theatrical or home entertainment "screeners" and access to screening links from studios and/or PR firms, and is provided with consumer electronics devices on loan from hardware manufacturers and/or PR firms respectively for the purposes of evaluating the products and its content for editorial reviews. We receive no compensation from these companies for our opinions or for the writing of reviews or editorials.
Permission is sometimes granted to companies to quote our work and editorial reviews free of charge. Our website may contain affiliate marketing links, which means we may get paid commission on sales of those products or the services we write about. Our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers or affiliate partnerships. This disclosure is provided in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR § 255.5: Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.

Latest Articles

%d bloggers like this: